Tax credits are some of the most valuable tools around to help cut your tax bill. But figuring out how to use these credits on your tax return can get complicated very quickly. Here’s what you need to know.
Understanding the difference
To help illustrate the difference between a credit and a deduction, here is an example of a single taxpayer making $50,000 in 2025.
Tax Deduction Example: Gee I. Johe earns $50,000 and owes $5,000 in taxes. If you add a $1,000 tax deduction, he’ll decrease his $50,000 income to $49,000, and owe about $4,800 in taxes.
Result: A $1,000 tax deduction decreases Gee’s tax bill by $200, from $5,000 to $4,800.
Tax Credit Example: Now let’s assume Gee has a $1,000 tax credit versus a deduction. Gee’s tax bill decreases from $5,000 to $4,000, while his $50,000 income stays the same.
Result: A $1,000 tax credit decreases your tax bill from $5,000 to $4,000.
In this example, your tax credit is five times as valuable as a tax deduction.
Credits are usually worth more
Credits are generally worth much more than deductions. However there are several hurdles you have to clear before being able to take advantage of a credit.
To illustrate, consider the popular child tax credit.
Hurdle #1: Meet basic qualifications
You can claim a $2,200 tax credit for each qualifying child you have on your 2025 tax return. The good news is that the IRS’s definition of a qualifying child is fairly broad, but there are enough nuances to the definition that Hurdle #1 could get complicated. And then to make matters more complicated…
Hurdle #2: Meet income qualifications
If you make too much money, you can’t claim the credit. If you’re single, head of household or married filing separately, the child tax credit completely goes away if you exceed $240,000 of taxable income. If you’re married filing jointly, the credit disappears above $440,000 of income.
Hurdle #3: Meet income tax qualifications
To claim the entire $2,200 child tax credit, you must owe at least $2,200 of income tax. For example, if you owe $3,000 in taxes and have one child that qualifies for the credit, you can claim the entire $2,200 credit. But if you only owe $1,000 in taxes, the maximum amount of the child tax credit you can claim is $1,700.
Take the tax credit…but get help!
The bottom line is that tax credits are usually more valuable than tax deductions. But tax credits also come with lots of rules that can be confusing. Please call to schedule a tax planning session to make sure you make the most of the available tax credits for your situation.
Couples often name money as a major source of tension – but it can also become one of your greatest tools for building trust and momentum together. When approached intentionally, money stops being a stressor and starts becoming a strategy. Here are some ideas for creating financial harmony with your long-term partner or spouse.
Be radically transparent. Honesty about money should start early. Both partners should understand the full financial picture including income, debts, savings, investments, and credit history, says everydayhealth.com. Major obligations such as student loans, credit card balances, or family financial responsibilities should never come as a surprise years into the relationship. Secrecy around money erodes trust quickly.
Transparency also extends beyond numbers. Spending habits, avoidance tendencies, and emotional triggers around money matter just as much as account balances.
Have recurring future-focused conversations. Make space for proactive conversations about where you are headed financially. Children, career moves, business ventures, caregiving, travel, and retirement all carry financial implications. If your long-term visions drift apart, put them back on a common course.
According to Mutual of Omaha, consider revisiting these discussions periodically. Goals and priorities evolve, and staying aligned requires ongoing communication.
Understand each other’s financial comfort zones. Two people can earn the same income yet feel very different levels of security, says the financial tech company Beem.com. One may view a mortgage or low-interest loan as practical, while the other prefers minimal debt and maximum stability.
Talk through specific scenarios, for example how much savings feels safe, what level of debt is acceptable, and what qualifies as a splurge. These conversations reveal deeper beliefs about risk and security. The objective is not to win the argument, but to understand each other’s reasoning.
Divide responsibilities, but build shared competence. One partner may enjoy the details while the other prefers strategy. Divide responsibilities accordingly, but avoid letting one person disengage completely, suggests The Gottman Institute.
Whether it is paying bills, managing investments, or meeting with advisors, both partners need to understand the accounts, obligations, and key documents. This includes access to the accounts in case of an unforeseen health event.
Turn conflict into collaboration. Disagreements are inevitable. One partner may prioritize experiences, while the other focuses on saving or upgrading practical needs. Rather than turning these moments into battles, the website theknot.com says to approach them as shared design challenges. Look for solutions that respect both security and enjoyment – perhaps adjusting the scale of a purchase or setting aside personal spending allowances.
When couples approach money as a shared strategy rather than a recurring argument, something powerful happens. Financial discussions stop feeling like threats and start feeling like planning sessions for a future you are intentionally building together.
Filing your 2025 tax return may feel like crossing a finish line. In reality, this moment is the starting point for smart tax planning during 2026. Here are several ideas to kick start your own tax planning cycle.
If you get a big refund, adjust your withholdings. A large refund may feel rewarding, but it often means you gave the government an interest-free loan all year. This money could have supported debt reduction, savings, or investments, instead. After filing, revisit your Form W-4 and run a projection for 2026. Fine-tuning your withholding improves monthly cash flow and reduces the likelihood of over-correcting later in the year.
If you have a big tax bill, review estimated tax payments. A significant balance due is more than an inconvenience. It may signal under-withholding or insufficient quarterly estimates. Early in the year is the ideal time to correct course. Review income sources, especially self-employment, investment, or bonus income, and adjust estimated payments accordingly.
Plan now to take advantage of the $1,000 above-the-line charitable donation deduction. With an above-the-line charitable deduction available ($2,000 for married couples), thoughtful giving becomes even more strategic. Consider your cash flow to optimize the timing of donations. Spreading contributions across the year may make budgeting easier, while ensuring you fully utilize the deduction.
Review retirement contribution limits for 2026. Confirm contribution limits for IRAs, 401(k)s, and other qualified plans for 2026, and evaluate whether you can increase deferrals. Even modest monthly adjustments can significantly reduce taxable income over the course of a year. Starting early also makes it easier to reach maximum contribution thresholds without straining year-end cash flow.
Plan HSA contributions and medical expenses. Health Savings Accounts offer a rare triple tax benefit – deductible contributions, tax-free growth, and tax-free qualified withdrawals. Review eligibility, contribution limits, and anticipated medical expenses for 2026. Coordinating planned procedures, prescriptions, or ongoing care with your funding strategy can enhance the tax benefit while keeping healthcare spending organized and predictable.
Take into account life events. Major life changes often reshape your tax profile. Marriage can alter filing status and bracket exposure. Divorce may affect dependency claims and support payments. A new child can unlock credits and deductions. Anticipating these shifts allows you to update withholding, adjust estimated payments, and plan eligibility for credits before the year unfolds.
Pay attention to no tax on tips and overtime. Accurate tracking becomes essential if you receive tip and/or overtime income. Confirm how your employer reports this income and ensure payroll systems reflect proper treatment. Employers and business owners must also review compliance procedures. Understanding how these earnings are classified early in the year helps prevent reporting errors and maximizes any available benefit.
The most effective tax strategies are built early. Use your filed 2025 tax return as a starting point, make adjustments now, and give your 2026 plan room to work in your favor.
Fraud and embezzlement don’t just happen at large companies. In fact, theft may be more common in small businesses because many lack internal controls that are typically in place at larger organizations. But the good news is that effective internal controls don’t have to be complicated or expensive.
The best way for your business to battle fraud is to create a segregation of duties framework. With segregation of duties, you split the responsibilities for each of three different areas: authorization of cash expenditures, physical custody of cash and reconciliation of cash expenditures to different individuals.
Here’s what you need to know:
Segregate cash disbursements. Payment responsibilities should never rest with a single individual. One employee should review and approve vendor bills, while another processes the payment. The person preparing checks should not have authority to sign them. Electronic payments and fund transfers require similar separation – one person initiates the transaction, another reviews the details, and a separate, authorized manager gives final approval. The same layered approach applies to purchase orders: one team member issues or requests the order, another approves it, and payment is released only after proper review. Dividing these duties ensures management has visibility into how funds are spent and significantly reduces the risk of error or misappropriation.
Segregate control of cash. Have an owner or manager occasionally spot check incoming electronic transactions and tie them to the company bank account. If you receive physical checks, have an owner or manager open the mail before passing it on to accounting. That’s one way to detect unusual transactions before they’re recorded in the company books. Alternatively, you might ask someone separate from accounting to open the mail and prepare a deposit slip, or prepare a daily reconciliation of all transactions.
Pay special attention to ACH receipts. Unlike physical checks which leave a paper trail and involve multiple handling steps, ACH payments post directly to a bank account without anyone physically touching the money. This convenience reduces natural oversight points. If the same person has access to online banking and records receipts in the accounting system, errors or intentional misstatements may go undetected.
Segregate reconciliations. For companies with limited resources, a periodic review of bank reconciliations by someone outside of accounting can provide a mitigating control. Non-accounting personnel performing these reviews will need to be trained. They’ll need to understand the risks involved and the types of unusual or unsupported transactions needing further investigation. Cross training staff also helps to ensure continuity of operations when accounting employees take vacations or leave the company. Or better yet, bring in an outside accounting expert to conduct periodic audits of key functions.
Management by wondering around. As an owner, periodically review your bank accounts and the activity in them. Ask questions about transactions that are large. Even if you already know the answer, your team will know you are looking. The same goes with your general ledger. Get access to the ledger and periodically look at the details behind an account or two. You may be surprised what you find. Again, your questions will show your engagement and the randomness of this activity will serve as a simple audit technique.
Segregation of duties can help your company keep track of cash and help prevent theft by an employee before it happens.
This year marks 250 years of American independence, which also means two-and-a-half centuries of spirited debate over taxes. From the nation’s earliest days, revenue has been raised in inventive, controversial, and occasionally head-scratching ways, often followed closely by creative attempts to avoid it. To mark this anniversary, our annual tax quiz explores the lesser-known, stranger corners of U.S. tax history.
In the 1790s, the federal government imposed a tax that sparked armed resistance in western Pennsylvania. What was the tax actually on?
A. Horse ownership B. Whiskey distillation C. Imported tea D. Playing cards
B – The Whiskey Tax wasn’t aimed at casual drinkers but at distillers, many of whom were small frontier farmers turning grain into shelf-stable income. To them, the tax felt like a coastal money grab, and protests escalated into the Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington personally led troops to put it down, proving two things early on – the federal government would enforce tax laws, and Americans would complain loudly about them.
During the Civil War, Congress briefly experimented with a federal income tax. What was one unexpected thing taxpayers were allowed to deduct?
A. Bribes paid to avoid the draft B. The cost of hired farm labor C. Losses from shipwrecks D. Beard-grooming expenses
C – Shipwreck losses. In an era when commerce moved by sea and river, losing a shipment to a wreck was a real business risk. The government recognized this long before it figured out depreciation schedules or standardized forms. Sadly for the bearded, personal grooming never made the cut.
In the early nineteenth century, tariffs were the federal government’s main revenue source. Which item was once considered so politically dangerous to tax that it helped trigger a constitutional crisis?
A. Wool coats B. Iron nails C. Imported hats D. Cheap British textiles
D – Cheap British textiles. Protective tariffs raised prices on imported cloth to support American manufacturers, but Southern states relied heavily on imports and exports. The resulting tariff fights fueled the Nullification Crisis, where South Carolina flirted with ignoring federal law entirely. It turns out fabric can tear a nation, metaphorically and almost literally.
Before payroll withholding existed, how did many Americans pay their income taxes during World War II?
A. By mailing cash in envelopes B. Through quarterly visits from IRS agents C. In a single painful lump sum D. With war bonds only
C – One lump sum. Taxpayers were expected to save throughout the year and then pay all at once, which went about as well as you’d expect. Withholding was introduced partly to fund the war efficiently and partly to stop widespread shock, confusion, and strongly worded letters to Washington, D.C.
In 1895 the Supreme Court ruled a federal income tax was unconstitutional. What was the main reason?
A. It unfairly targeted farmers B. It violated states’ rights C. It wasn’t apportioned among the states D. Congress forgot to define income
C – Apportionment. The Constitution required certain taxes to be divided among states based on population, not income. The income tax didn’t do that, so it failed on technical grounds. The 16th Amendment later fixed this, proving that sometimes the solution to tax problems is more paperwork at the federal level.
At various points in U.S. history, Congress has taxed purely to change behavior rather than raise money. Which of these was explicitly intended to discourage its use?
A. Colored margarine B. Wooden houses C. Cheap paper D. Public theaters
A – Colored margarine. To protect dairy farmers, from the 1880s to 1950 Congress taxed margarine that was artificially colored to look like butter. The result was grayish margarine and widespread consumer resentment. Eventually, common sense – and better food science – prevailed.
How Did You Score?
5 – 6 correct: You could probably audit the 18th century. Historians salute you, accountants trust you, and the IRS would like to know your availability for consulting.
3 – 4 correct: You may not be ready to draft tax policy, but you’d absolutely survive a colonial tavern debate about whiskey taxes.
1 – 2 correct: Consider this your official introduction to the wonderfully strange world of U.S. tax history, and a reminder that some of these questions would have puzzled people in the actual centuries they happened.
